Видео

9 years, and im the first comment. Clearly, no one cares. Help yourselves, stop relying on govt and taxpayers to wipe your arses for you.

love this I hope to grow up like you Rosemary

Welp

When you have a population that is so docile brainwashed by the Government, Mainstream Media what do you expect? They are taking more and more of your rights away, freedoms away under the guise it's for your own safety and the population is gullible and falls for it. During the COVID Pandemic the Government said we will lock you up inside your own houses and the docile brainwashed gullible population complied like a sheep 🐑

But isn't a prejudice when you set an a idea not confirmed about someone in other person like kids, for example, this, men are going to be racist, sexist, and homofobic with you.

Theres no need to alter the constitution ,aboriginals already have more representation than anyother Australian, there's that many organisations already that are supposed to listen to what they need, wheres all the billions gone that have supposedly gone to fix their problems it needs auditing, they dont need another layer of bureaucracy they need the organisations that's already there to do there job. We also need DNA testing so any moneys or help go to true aboriginals not those that have less than a quarter of Aboriginal in them. Stop this routing of all tax payers money .

Didn't give a definition. Silly video

Thanks mam cleared this topic

🧚🏻‍♂️☯️💒🗽🌏🕵🏻🌌🤗

Even in these hilariously generalizing examples, look who the discriminations coming from? Do we think elevating poor/base methods of communication is something we really want to do?

Selamat pagi ,ibu Maurice salam sehat

STOP BEING HATEFUL!😤🛑

DISCRIMINATION SPREADS HATE AND FUELS FALSE FEAR WHEN THERE IS ACTUALLY PEACE AND NO NEED TO BE HATEFUL OR TO FEAR. STOP SPREADING HATE AND FUELING FALSE FEAR!👍🏾💯

Hatred and bias for another person, race, opinion, belief or gender; to cause another injury or harm because of one's beliefs to be superior above another; to oppress another; unequality; to resist the presence of another race, nationality, belief or culture because it is not your preferred group or belief; to unlawfully exercise hatred of bigotry toward another for no legitimate reason; to see as inferior as a result of gender, race, nationality or beliefs; to manipulate your authority or power toward others because of your own personal preferrences that limits or restricts anothers freedom or LEGAL rights.

Americans don’t have discrimination even with sex! 😂😂😂 This is why they have this anti-discrimination law! Americans will have sex with you regardless of sex, race, gender, nationality, age, status or disability 😂😂😂😂 They have no standards in SEX! 😂😂😂

If laws are just they should be retroactive because they only affect behaviour that any reasonable person should have known not to do with or without a law. Laws and rules are literally for the ignorant. If the law says you can do a harmful thing, you can't, and vice versa.

🧚🏻‍♂️🌌🦅🤗

Well done!

Lets hit on white and claim we want self determination for all. Yeah right? Fkn hypocrites

Discrimination still exists in any part of the world to this day, I'm just glad people are able to express themselves more now and that fights for their concerns and issues are being acknowledged by more people nowadays.

Great intro to discrimination. Thanks.

Discrimination ruined lives. Dont forget living in a trash community and trash neighbourhood like mine

uber amazon and Mexican cartels

Discrimination = Preference Preference is Choice

𝕡𝐫ｏ𝕄ｏ𝔰𝓶 😊

Race, gender, sexual orientation, religion and disability discrimination should all be stopped.

Thank you ma'am

Maine, Thanks.

Pray For Swaziland

As long as the Psychiatric industry continues to be erroneously funded by Governments for ALL possible Life Event situations involving any level of Psychological Crisis or Stress such as situations like Centerlink Robodebts, State Ombudsman Investigations, Local Council Corruption, Employment Redundancy, Grief & Loss, Sexual Assault, Family Violence, Victims of Crime or Terrorism, various Trauma, Compensation Claims or the standard Stages of Youth Psychological Development, instead of ONLY the serious psychiatric illnesses that ACTUALLY require Institutionalised responses using heavy sedation, then Euthanasia can never be legalised in Australia.... Otherwise Doctors & Psychiatrists are simply going to Prescibe Euthanasia for the "Medical Response" - just like what is already happening in the Netherlands! Survivors of Sexual Assault who developed PTSD, Anxiety or Depression for example are already being routinely prescribed Euthanasia by their Doctors & Psychiatrists in the Netherlands. People like Australian of the Year Grace Tame would have been "put out of her Misery" in the fkn Netherlands! As would any number of retuned Military Servicemen or Women with PTSD or potentially any COMPLEX injury received in Battle... How can a Country maintain a Defence Force if its just too COMPLEX to keep them alive? For example I recently saw a Billionaire give a "Motivational Speech" on the Truth about the "Evil 1%" & he was preaching about Poverty & how providing more housing, support & finances is just pointless, because the issues of Poverty are COMPLEX so why bother even helping people just to live another day? And he was a fkn DOCTOR! 💥 I mean since WHEN do Paramedics arrive at an Emergency & decide that an injury is simply too COMPLEX to even bother providing Treatment for, so what's the point in even applying a Tourniquet - it's more HUMANE to simply allow them bleed to death... Or since when does a Vet assess a Dog hit by a Car with survivable injuries & decislde it's just too COMPLEX to even bother with Treatment, it's KINDER to just put them out of their misery? You want Australia & it's Health Services to be transformed into something like a "Kill Shelter" for Animals do you? Havnt you noticed the Community efforts to ERADICATE such Kill Shelters for Animals? Why would the community accept Hospitals to become "Kill Shelters" for potentially any COMPLEX health issue that isn't the common fkn cold? You don't get to play with more powerful "Toys" while you still can't responsibly manage the ones you've already got! People are still free in Australia to collect a Benzodiazapine Prescription from their GP & buy a Bottle of Gin - we don't need the fkn State "Putting People out of their Misery" thank you very much! If you don't like it, move to the fkn Netherlands Denton! 💥 You would probably be more happy living with such standards of Health Care ANYWAY! 💥

terrible sound

2:30

I would love to have euthanasia as life isnt for me me I'm totally done

Dirty

best luck

this is the first person talking about this with the comments on i have seen

dad the freekshow is in town

"Yo, Stan! Stan the man. Tell me, why shouldn't Russia be able to bomb Ukraine? Just a question that won't incite any violence among intelligent people. Cheers."

It’s really helpful.. Thanks

There is no law, it is just ink on paper.

How can someone who is not a Lawyer or registered in any court system 🤔 "Give any legal advice and in her many cases Legal demanding decisions"??? Wow the Uni systematic BS wins again i see.

I don't know what are they

Why dont you people focus on moving ahead and stop with all this bs.

? "This is Australia", they said. "Here?" they followed on, "This sort of thing doesn't happen in Australia." A reply with some hesitancy and confidence came in the form of "Errr, yes." Then, came silence. 'Silence' comes in many forms and for many reasons. It can be unexpected and surprising. Does 'silence' share the same space as 'free speech'? Is 'silence' a form of 'free speech', two sides of the same coin? Now, if you were asked, 'quick, speak up'? Is your mind full of ideas to share or has it unexpectedly gone blank. How about if you were given on moment of silence to reflect? Silence can be the space between words, a visual delineator between each word on a page or the passage of time between an exchange of words, like the time from the end of one Australian public speaking club meeting, club (local) of course, and the beginning of the next Australian public speaking club meeting. Silence, can be ... dot dot dot, in a sort of 'fill in the blank', like in a questionnaire, it can be the space provided to speak up, respect for other people and their freedom of thought, without interference. A freedom that is familiar at the Australian public speaking clubs, the freedom of speech, and, without state interference. This freedom, can come under the form of many names, and silence has been choosen to be exercised, not to go into details, however, a brief list of freedoms associated with freedom of speech include freedom of choice, of belief, of expression, of opinion, of the press, of conscience, of communication. Silence, can be a breath of fresh air, providing life to ideas, a prevention from being drowned out, from being silenced. Silence can be deafening, and speech can fall on deaf ears. Silence and speech, at the very least comes with responsibilities, and in some situations, rights and privileges. In being a member of an Australian public speaking club, it could be said, a privilege, but, can it be said it is a right? Is that 'the sound of silence'? (That is supposed to be a joke.) Perhaps the following exploration of ideas might bring things into focus. Broadly speaking, necessary for a functioning democracy, a legal separation of powers, between legislature, executive, and judiciary. Additionally, 'integrity' and 'the press, rhetorically, seen like a fourth branch of government, and critical for a functioning democracy. If the media's function above all else 'freedom of the press', then it possibly be more likely an argument to be made, putting into jeopardy journalists' privilege against disclosure of a source's protected information. In other words, in the scenario, the word 'privilege' is a legal right, not to speak up. How's that for irony? There are situations were, silence is assumed not to interfere with many aspects of democracy and the rule of law, including procedural fairness, like the ability for jurors to be found that have not already been influenced because 'silence' not exercised, ability for an accused's intentionality to be judged, silence as a 'right of any citizen, not to answer questions asked by investigating officials at pretrial investigative stage. In court, not to give any evidence as a witness at their own trial.' ... all these things could possibly alter, the availability or not, of various types of immunities, if there are any, in later legal proceedings ... and, in some countries 'a trial judge must warn the jury that no adverse inference (of guilt) can be drawn from the failure of the accused to give sworn evidence.', and that, is from the dictionary.(Oxford Australian). 'Silence' and 'free speech', it would seem they could be two sides of the same coin. It would seem that 'silence' could share the same space as 'free speech'. There could possibly be a conundrum though. How can procedural fairness be maintained and how is 'silence' achievable in court, if unable to secure representation and without giving up the legal presumption that, as an adult, you can make your own decisions from choices? Life is full of unexpected surprises. "This is Australia", they said. "Here?" they followed on, "This sort of thing doesn't happen in Australia? ". Speech given on Feb 25, 2021: (edited). 'The Macquarie Dictionary defines advice in the first instance as 'an opinion recommended, or offered, as worthy to be followed ' and an opinion, in the fourth, 'Law, a. Also, advisory opinion. formal or non-binding advice as to the legal position relating to some matter'. The Oxford Australian Law Dictionary in the first instance defines legal advice as 'information given by a legal practitioner to a client(...)' and in the second instance 'the practitioner's opinion(...)'. In contrast, Legal aid (lsc.sa.gov.au/cb_pages/applyonline.php ) requires that 8.(c) ( was 7.(c)) you must follow your lawyer's advice. Legal aid can be stopped if you do not do this; and, 12. (Was 11.) once you accept legal aid, the conditions of aid will apply to you whether or not you agree with them or understand them. ' .... - adult, majority, capacity (to)? Also, 4. legal aid is not free, and acceptance of legal aid includes acceptance of, 5. paying back costs. Victoria Law Foundation - Why do good lawyers represent bad people? Dec 22, 2014 If "people are entitled to the best defence they can get, these days, that usually means the best defence they can afford", does that mean that if the best defence a person can get isn't very good, then, their entitlement is limited to a defence that isn't very good? is that then not a judgement, a determination that a person who does not know any better, is entitled to defence that isn't very good? aIso, does that mean there is a correlation between quality of defence and quantity of the monetary value sought for time, i.e. rate, and proportional to total monetary quantity available over time? If so, the amount sought for defence would be representational of quality, and for the purposes of defence, it would not then matter if a person was eligible for legal aid, as a fixed total amount available for a given rate would not be competitive with an amount available over an indetermined amount of time greater than could be afforded by legal aid at the same rate. As for " why do doctors cure bad people, because they don't make ethical judgments", who does determine which people are bad and need to be cured by a doctor? If so does that make those particular doctors complicit?Otherwise, it would seem to more apt to say, because they can pay. In those scenarios it would seem the professions role to be more administrative and less so of that of an actual profession. What have I got wrong here?' ........................ "Colonies and States: In colonial times and into the twentieth century, ... In those States where criminal offences have been codified, these offences still exist today. In the other States, however, seditious libel, uttering seditious words, and participation in a seditious conspiracy were, and still are, common law offences. The exceptions are in South Australia and the Australian Capital Territory, where legislation has repealed the common law offence." From aph gov au About_Parliament Parliamentary_Department Parliamentary_Library Publication_Archive archive sedition It seems that sedition provisions, for prohibited conduct, are part of the Criminal Code 1995 (Cth), and, the fault element for that prohibited conduct, is seditious intention and as that intention is defined in state and territory legislation. ........................ It seems like the following might be not irrelevant though, regardless of whether it is a federal or state level issue ....... ... legal capacity ... legal incapacity ... legal disability ... disability ... impairment ... substitute decision-making ... supported decision making ... supportive attorney ... general and or enduring power of attorney ... plenary guardian ... guardianship and administration ... public advocate ... I had lawyers in court argue that I needed a legal guardian to make decisions for me, instead of me, because I have a physical disability, as that according to the argument meant I had a legal disability which meant legal incapacity which meant not having capacity, as any adult over eighteen would, to make decisions which were legally binding. I was and still am self-represented and something I would not be able to do if I did not have the capacity to do so, although, that capacity those not mean I have the skills and know how of a solicitor, team of solicitors, or a barrister with thirty years experience and at the top of their field of specialisation. It seems like it is not unreasonable to forsee how, with an aging population and or people young or old with disabilities, play on words and general understanding or not, and various other factors like house titles and nursing home fees and such forth, that it could result in many not retaining their legal capacity and also therefore their right to make any decision with authority regarding their own life as an individual, or, to vote? Please tell me I am not correct.

Man thats some racism discrimination

You are amazing. Thank you for your voice ❤️❤️❤️

This is really good : the graphics, the presenter, the not-so-subtle sarcasm!

ruclips.net/video/GzWSI84enXs/видео.html

bruh the girl says way to many words for a kid her age lmfao

Thank you very much!! I was stuck at "retrospective effect, prospective and retroactive" for half an hour. After watching this video, I finally understand retrospective.